Comments for [ Kasheer ] - كشیر

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by bilhan kaul

bilhan kaul — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:56:55 +0000

Mr juz a Kashmiri you have not answered my fundemental question.Okay let us move on.Look English ruled India including Kashmir for 200 years and they did lot for us . I must say some of our books were translated by them and made world famous.But they are and were outsiders on Indian subcontinent.Had Englismen settled in india and made Kashmir its own how could we refuse them this right.But had Englismen converted kashmiris which they could have easily done you could possibly have sung differnt tune.So why take history seriously .Alexander invaded India and could we see its impact now. My answer is no.But we could still see the tragic consequences of islamic invasion. That is precisely the point Mr Juz Kashmiri. I am liberal and i will be shocked if Americans adopt Hinduisim. I do not see them giving them any benefit. I AM NOT INTERSTED IN PANDIT CULTURE BUT LOVE PAGAN CULTURE OF kASHMIR.Your ancestors temples were razed and thousands of villages of Kahmir were given islamic names and instead of islam being a guest in Kashmir it changed your faith and made your ancestors look alien in your eyes. i am not blaming you as it could have happened to me as well if my ancestor had adopted islam. So my request to you do not take past conquest of kashmir seriously or more precisely do not allow it be serious affair.

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by Juz A Kashmiri

Juz A Kashmiri — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:17:20 +0000

Kaul Sb.. Aadab Arz,

You say

They are alienated because their ancestors have adopted islam on the soil of indian subcontinent and that is root and branch of all Kashmir conflict

Ok now let us have some more pearls of wisdom from you. So you are advocating a situation where sub-continent should not sport any linkages with Islam – the religion which means peace (I don’t identify myself with the motives that 26-11 villians had).
And may I know on what basis, If we go by your reasoning perhaps no religion should be allowed to flourish in the sub-continent but the faith you profess. Isn’t that being jingoistic and hateful?

Juz A Kashmiri

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by bilhan kaul

bilhan kaul — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:26:42 +0000

Well mr someone i am here to win the arguement and not to build in any artificial wall on the basis of religion and mind it . Kashmir is not part of Arab subcontinent and keep it in mind too. Oneof the commentators on kashmir says that Kashmiris are alienated. But alienated from what and that is a million dollar question. They are alienated because their ancestors have adopted islam on the soil of indian subcontinent and that is root and branch of all Kashmir conflict

Comment on Afzal Guru’s case by bilhan kaul

bilhan kaul — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:30:51 +0000

Sayyid Geelani is shouting from top of the roof that Kashmir is a disputed territory since 1947.But herein lies the problem Sayyid Geelani. Kashmiri Pandits have accepted date of dispute from 1st june 1340.,hence mr Geelani you are outsider on Kashmir soil, please take your route back to Geelan where rightfully you belong.

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by Someone

Someone — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:20:09 +0000

Bilhan,

You have simply buttressed my point of view.

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by bilhan kaul

bilhan kaul — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:40:42 +0000

Well Mr someone; if you carefully look at all the posts i have written religion is least on my mind but it is on the mind of Kashmiris. Because problem is religious nationalism in Kashmir.Hence , my question to you is simple; if you seriously beleive in me ; you and others why were then kashmiris converted.They were converted for political purposes.I am anxious about naga and pishcha festival which were adopted by Kashmiri Pandits from others dying in the valley. In other words Kashmiri Pandits were maintaning festivals which were and are festivals of converted people. So i have always maintained conversion is at root of all the troubles in Kashmirand i too have maintained that i respect the culture of outsiders settled in valley. Comment upon Arabs is an example given how much converted people are dominated by Arabs.If you look carefully i am not passing comment on Arab cultue and religion , it is their culture and whom am i to pass comment

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by Someone

Someone — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:29:41 +0000

I challenge friend Bilhan Kaul to comment on a post without any mention of word Arab domination / discrimination and without trying to fault Islam for every wrong he sees.

Someone

Comment on Reply to Mr. Arun Jaitley by BadGirl95

BadGirl95 — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:16:16 +0000

This contrasted with parallel titles of the same names which contained conventional hardboiled crime fiction. ,

Comment on Reply to Mr. Arun Jaitley by Alex15

Alex15 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:32:04 +0000

This seems to suggest that the higher temperature of the warm-blooded animal includes the advantage of enabling it to get rid of its entropy at a quicker rate, so that it can afford a more intense life process. ,

Comment on ‘Men in uniform are Kashmir’s problem, not solution’ : Sanjay Kak by bilhan kaul

bilhan kaul — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:25:22 +0000

Well MR z.We are not speaking for India.You People always complain that you are discriminated.In other words you presume beforehand that since india is a land of Hindus therfore we are discrimnated.In other words it is a guilt complex . Because Kashmir is part of indian subcontinent.Therfore conversion is at the root of all troubles in kashmir. Since Arab muslims discriminte on the basis of religion therfore conveted Kashmiri has to believe that he is discrimnated.In the past it was a ploy to strengthen neo converts and give them different identity.